Adaptive Functioning Among Older Adults: The Essence of Information Processing Speed in Executive Functioning, Psychological Correlates of Self-Rated Resilience in the Context of Subjective Cognitive Concerns in Older Adults, An Examination of Visual Quality of Life and Functional Vision Among Collision and Non-Collision Athletes Over a Competitive Season, The Relations Between an Inventory-Based Measure of Executive Function and Impulsivity Factors in Alcohol- and Cannabis-Relevant Outcomes, A Neuropsychological Battery for the Evaluation of Dementia Among Mandarin-Speaking Older Adults in the United States, About Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, About the National Academy of Neuropsychology, Dwan, Ownsworth, Chambers, Walker, & Shum, 2015, Green, Melo, Christensen, Ngo, Monette and Bradbury's (2008), Mathias, Bowden, Bigler, and Rosenfeld (2007), Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. WebThe raw scores for the Matching Numbers, Planned Codes, and Expressive Attention subtests are based on the combination of time and number correct. Extensive training in the administration and scoring of all tests was provided to three research assistants over several days by the lead author, and the testing sessions were closely monitored and supervised to ensure full compliance with the standardised administration and scoring procedures. Controls were excluded if they had been diagnosed with psychiatric disorders (except mild depression), substance abuse, or neurologic diseases. National Adult Reading Test (NART): For the assessment of premorbid intelligence in patients with dementia: Test manual. Use of the TOPF as was designed is recommended. The benefit of including the sum of NART and WTAR errors on estimation accuracy was negligible. Disclaimer. The Top-J takes approximately 10 minutes to administer and score. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! where genetic risk is defined by having an FH of psychosis or a diagnosis of Can be given in addition to WAIS-IV / WMS-IV assessment to provide an estimate of change in abilities. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. (, Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG. Register to receive personalised research and resources by email. Specifically, they found that the estimated IQs of 42% of their participants improved by five or more points, providing evidence that the NART may underestimate IQ in patients with severe TBI still within the first year of recovery. Descriptive analyses, ttests, and chi-squared tests were utilized to identify and compare cognitive profiles. HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help Written informed consent was obtained from each participant or a legally authorized representative. Paired t-tests (two-tailed) revealed significant differences between hold and no-hold combined measurements. Learn about a patient referred for neuropsychological testing when a neurological evaluation and brain imaging were inconclusive. They reported significantly higher NART scores upon second testing. This has been a consistent problem with literature in the field and should be addressed in future studies with both pre- and post-injury intelligence testing. Nevertheless, we question the ambition of the tools developed to date and encourage the development of novel approaches to improving premorbid estimates. Bold values indicate significance at p < .05. B., Gordon, W.A., et al. Due to the relatively small sample size, we were unable to separate the mild and the complicated mild TBI groups or the moderate and severe TBI groups. The extent to which specific disorders may impact on those abilities assessed with tests such as the NART or WTAR is difficult to predict, particularly for more severely impaired patients or those with language and/or semantic memory impairment, and more work is required in this area. measure of premorbid intelligence. PMC Overall, the level of unexplained variance in performance across hold and no-hold tests in our neurologically healthy sample cautions against the viability of using this method for accurately predicting premorbid ability in cognitively impaired patients. It was hypothesized that performance on these measures would improve over time whereas the WTAR remained stable. The UAB Institutional Review Board approved the study procedures. FOIA 2021 Sep-Oct;28(5):564-572. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1664547. These models were developed to predict scores on particular IQ tests (e.g., Obtaining accurate estimates of premorbid intelligence allows clinicians to more accurately quantify the extent of cognitive impairment that a patient has sustained following traumatic brain injury (TBI). The WTAR (Wechsler, 2001)comprises 50 words with irregular pronunciations that participants read aloud. Keywords: For example, Powell et al. Assessment. Utility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination in predicting general intellectual abilities. The original published estimates of WAIS (dotted) and WAIS-R FSIQ (wide-space dashed) from the manual (Nelson & Willison, Citation1991) are included for comparison. Individuals with a prior mTBI were included if their previous injury occurred at least 1 year before enrollment. Brasure, M., Lamberty, G. J., Sayer, N. A., Nelson, N. W., Macdonald, R., Ouellette, J., et al. Our results are also consistent with other TBI studies, which used hold measures comparable to the WTAR, such as the National Adult Reading Test (NART) and the Reading subtest from the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT). These results indicate that for patients with msevTBI, word-reading tests may not be a reliable measure of premorbid intelligence during the immediate recovery period and possibly longer. Clinicians are encouraged to administer the entire WAIS-IV, or at minimum the VCI subtests, for a more accurate measure of intelligence in those with above average intelligence and history of TBI. Method: Fax: +1 (800) 232-1223, Digital Assessment Library for Schools (K-12), Digital Assessment Library for Universities, Guidanceon using this test in yourtelepractice. 2022 Sep 22;8(1):e12348. Estimated IQ; Intelligence; Test of Premorbid Functioning; Veteran; WAIS-IV. WebThe Test of Premorbid Functioning (TOPF) (Delis, Kaplan, & Kramer, 2009) was administered to assess individuals premorbid verbal intelligence. official website and that any information you provide is encrypted To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. Two of these measures were chosen for analyses as they assess areas of cognition known to be sensitive to the effects of head injury (Rabinowitz & Levin, 2014): Trail Making Test (TMT), Part A and B (Reitan & Wolfson, 1993), and the California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II) Trials 15 Total (Delis, Kramer, Kaplan, & Ober, 2000). Furthermore, we assess whether a combination of NART/WTAR and demographic information improves predictive accuracy and compare NART/WTAR performance against the WAIS-IV embedded hold tests as measures of WAIS-IV FSIQ. The .gov means its official. Furthermore, the calculation of a premorbid IQ estimate on the basis of a subset of the same tests used to calculate current IQ suggests a psychometric flaw, in which there is very likely to be high predictive accuracy in healthy populations but questionable validity when applied in neurological patients. WebBest performance approaches to estimating premorbid ability are based upon the assumption that the tests in which patients accrue the highest score are likely to reflect The WTAR was co-normed with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence scale, Third Edition (WAIS-III; Wechsler, 1997). WebTest of Premorbid Functioning estimates an individual's pre-morbid cognitive and memory functioning. Benefits. The range of NART-derived FSIQ predicted values in our sample was 43 IQ points, with our regression analysis revealing that the full distribution of possible predicted values ranged from 78 (50 NART errors) to 126 (0 NART errors). An observed difference between expected performance and actual performance may indicate loss of functioning or there may be some other reason for lower test scores. There are a few limitations to the current study. Note: Values are meanSD or n (%).GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; GOAT = Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test; mTBI = mild traumatic brain injury; msevTBI = moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury; NA = not applicable. Although both TBI groups improved over time, those with msevTBI continued to be impaired relative to controls at 1 year post-injury. Bookshelf Find out how to use this test in your telepractice. WebFor all three groups, raw LOFT scores were converted to standard scores (estimated IQ) based on existing WTAR normative data. Correlations between the combined hold and no-hold measurements were larger, but even the combination of four no-hold tests explained only 35% of the variance of the combined hold measure. Figure 1. Similarly, a comparison of participants mean lowest subtest scaled score (7.85) against their highest subtest scaled score (14.77) revealed a mean difference of 6.92 scaled points. Advanced Clinical Solutions for WAIS-IV and WMS-IV: Administration and scoring manual. Their findings suggest that severe TBI may negatively affect WTAR performance in the first year following injury. Proper TOPF scoring procedures are presented. Kirton JW, Soble JR, Marceaux JC, Messerly J, Bain KM, Webber TA, Fullen C, Alverson WA, McCoy KJM. Steward: NINDS. WebObjective: Premorbid estimates of intellectual functioning are a key to assessment. Includes a list of 70 words that have atypical grapheme to phoneme translations. and on two widely used word reading tests: National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson, H. E. (1982). The sample range was lower in our WTAR data, with 33 predicted FSIQ values, but the regression analysis revealed a wider distribution of estimates ranging from 59 (50 WTAR errors) to 120 (0 WTAR errors). Field work is currently underway to develop WAIS-V, which, once published, will require the development of new standardised estimates if use of the NART or WTAR is to continue. Analysis of participants WTAR-predicted IQ replicated these findings, with those with msevTBI improving from a predicted IQ of 88.7 (SD=14.7) to predicted IQ of 93.6 (SD=13.6), t(39)=2.97, p<.01, d=.47. (1991). We will update you as soon as the item is back in our stock. In this cross-sectional study, post-9/11 veterans (N = 233, 84.12% male) completed the TOPF, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV), and performance validity measures. Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Comparison of methods for estimating premorbid intelligence, Department of Psychology, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK; Vision & Eye Research Unit (VERU), Postgraduate Medical Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK, Vision & Eye Research Unit (VERU), Postgraduate Medical Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK; Department of Computing & Technology, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK, A demographically based index of premorbid intelligence for the WAISR, The National Adult Reading Test: Restandardisation against the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition, The national adult reading test as a measure of premorbid intelligence: A comparison with estimates derived from demographic variables, Estimating premorbid WAISR IQ with demographic variables: Regression equations derived from a UK sample, The NART as an index of prior intellectual functioning: A retrospective validity study covering a 66-year interval, Estimating premorbid intelligence by combining the NART and demographic variables: An examination of the NART standardisation sample and supplementary equations, Construct validity of the national adult reading test: A factor analytic study, Criterion validity of new WAISIII subtest scores after traumatic brain injury, Methods of estimating premorbid functioning, Estimating premorbid intelligence: Comparison of traditional and contemporary methods across the intelligence continuum, Accuracy of the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR) and National Adult Reading Test (NART) when estimating IQ in a healthy Australian sample, From aisle to labile: A hierarchical National Adult Reading Test scale revealed by Mokken scaling, A critical note on Lezaks best performance method in clinical neuropsychology, Dementia: The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels using the New Adult Reading Test, Office of Population, Censuses and Surveys. Scatterplots showing linear correlations relating number of the National Adult Reading Test (NART) and Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR) errors to (A) General Ability Index (GAI); (B) Verbal Comprehension (VCI); (C) Perceptual Reasoning (PRI); and (D) Working Memory (WMI). WebThe Test of Premorbid Functioning (ToPF), a word reading test co-normed with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4 th Edition (WAIS-IV), was examined as a tool for Data for the 23 items comprising the mini-NART (McGrory et al., Citation2015) were extracted to provide an overall score on this abbreviated version of the test. However, there are few published methods currently available that have been standardised against the most recent revision of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV; Wechsler, Citation2008). Although the NART and WTAR are among the most popular instruments for estimating premorbid WAIS IQ, only the former has been standardised against the most recent (fourth revision) of the WAIS battery (Bright et al., Citation2016). (, Kay, T., Harrington, D., Adams, R., Anderson, T., Berrol, S., Cicerone, K., et al. Top mental health tools all in one place. 2021 Apr;28(3):994-1003. doi: 10.1177/1073191119887441. and Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR; Wechsler, D. (2001). In addition to the WTAR, all participants were administered a standardized battery of neuropsychological tests. Although it is important to note that total citation counts will be biased towards longer established tests, they clearly demonstrate continued use of the NART and the WTAR, despite some indication that the TOPF is gaining popularity. Ideal for clinicians wishing to develop appropriate treatment plans. WebEstimates of premorbid intelligence obtained from the TOPF and WRAT-4 READ have a strong linear relationship, but systematically generate inconsistent estimates in a neurodegenerative disease clinical sample and should not be used interchangeably. This work was supported by the National Institute on Child Health and Human Development [grant no. Finally, the hold/no-hold approach, like best performance, requires that we accept the assumption that neurologically healthy populations perform similarly across all subtests. NART and WTAR raw error scores exhibited a large correlation [r(90)=.88, p<.001] and both measures also showed significant negative correlations with age [r(90)=.64 and .54, p <.001, for NART and WTAR respectively]. ZIA CL060079-09/ImNIH/Intramural NIH HHS/United States. *p-value for omnibus test of group differences. The development of standardised tools such as the NART and WTAR has undoubtedly improved the ability to predict meaningful baseline levels of performance so that the impact of a neurological condition on cognition can be judged. Bold values indicate significant single predictor models and stepwise multivariate models in which the fit is significantly improved. The unadjusted premorbid IQ is based on published tables developed through regression with TOPF alone as a predictor of IQ. Clinicians should therefore consider alternative measures to assess premorbid functioning in this TBI subpopulation. Definition of mild traumatic brain injury, Is performance on the Wechsler test of adult reading affected by traumatic brain injury, Pronunciation of irregular words is preserved in dementia, validating pre-morbid IQ estimation, The WRAT-3 reading subtest as a measure of premorbid intelligence among persons with brain injury, Cognitive sequelae of traumatic brain injury, How robust is performance on the National Adult Reading Test following traumatic brain injury, Fluid and crystallized intelligence: Effects of diffuse brain damage on the WAIS, A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary, Treatment consent capacity in patients with traumatic brain injury across a range of injury severity, WAIS-III Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. The FSIQ range was 80 to 150, with an arithmetic mean of 108.52 and standard deviation of 12.71. Those with msevTBI have a predicted IQ that is 13 points lower than healthy controls at 1 month post-injury and improve an average of 5 IQ points upon second testing a year later. The .gov means its official. Consistent with these findings were the large correlations between test performance and age, indicating that both the NART and WTAR tap crystallised knowledge (which typically improves across our sample age range) rather than fluid ability (which typically peaks in early adulthood and subsequently declines; Cattell, Citation1971). (, Kalmar, K., Novack, T. A., Nakase-Richardson, R., Sherer, M., Frol, A. Figure 3 presents scatterplots relating NART error to index scores. Moreover, the msevTBI group had a significant improvement in WTAR performance over the 1-year period. The ToPF frequently underestimated post-injury intelligence and is therefore not accurately measuring premorbid intelligence in our sample, particularly in those with above average to superior intelligence. Performance across the WAIS-IV measures also differed significantly [F(3, 272.59Footnote1)=3.12, p=.026], although pairwise comparisons revealed that only one effect remained significant following Bonferroni correction, with FSIQ higher than PSI (p=.043). (, Mathias, J. L., Bowden, S. C., Bigler, E. D., & Rosenfeld, J. V. (, McGurn, B., Starr, J. M., Topfer, J. Their study found a modest relationship between reading performance and indices of injury severity. Such scaling techniques may provide the basis for dramatic and highly significant increases in predictive power in our data, for example, we observed a 46% increase in the variance shared between rescaled NART values and WAIS-IV FSIQ. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. The WAIS-IV supplementary tests were administered to all participants at the end of the session but will not be reported here. In conclusion, WTAR performance appears to be negatively affected by msevTBI 1 month post-injury with improvement during the first year. Predicted General Ability Index (GAI)=.9656 NART errors+126.5Predicted Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI)=1.0745 NART errors+126.81Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI)=.6242 NART errors+120.18Working Memory Index (WMI)=.7901 NART errors+120.53, Predicted General Ability Index (GAI)=1.2025 WTAR errors+119.77Predicted Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI)=1.4411 WTAR errors+120.25Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI)=.6931 WTAR errors+115.06Working Memory Index (WMI)=.9579 WTAR errors+114.78. These analyses were followed with Dunnett's comparisons using healthy controls as the reference group. . Potential differences in demographic characteristics between control and TBI groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; age, years of education) or Pearson's chi-square tests (gender, race). Additionally, WTAR-estimated intelligence was similar to that predicted by the Crawford and Allan (1997) demographic equation. WebThe Test of Premorbid Functioning (TOPF) is a revised and updated version of the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading clinicians to estimate an individual's level of intellectual Epub 2019 Sep 13. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal Figure 1 provides an indication of comparative popularity of NART, WTAR and TOPF in research year-by-year. One such word pronunciation task is the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR; Wechsler, 2001). Age significantly improved the precision of FSIQ estimates based on NART and total NART+WTAR performance, and education improved WTAR-derived estimates only. Additionally, scores on the VCI and PRI subtests contribute to a General Ability Index (GAI), typically employed in cases in which disproportionate working memory and/or processing speed difficulties complicate the interpretation of FSIQ (Wechsler, Citation2008). The Test of Premorbid Functioning (ToPF), a word reading test co-normed with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 4th Edition (WAIS-IV), was examined as a tool for estimating premorbid intelligence in persons with a history of TBI. The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Our overall aim was to establish which method, or combination of methods, offers the most accurate prediction of WAIS-IV FSIQ and its constituent indices. Includes scoring and reporting digital-only when used separately from WMS-IV. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Would you like email updates of new search results? To request a reprint or commercial or derivative permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below. The msevTBI group had lower baseline GOAT scores, t(78)=4.81, p<.001, scores than those with mTBI. An opportunity sample of 100 neurologically healthy adults (mean age 40 years; range 18 to 70; SD 16.78) were recruited primarily from university campuses in Cambridge and London, local retail environments and via social media, of which eight participants failed to complete one or more tests and were excluded from all analyses. A year later, 15% of individuals with msevTBI continued to have a WTAR-predicted IQ 1.5 SDs below the mean. The TOPF Actual and Predicted scores were related to FSIQ. We discuss and encourage the development of new methods for improving premorbid estimates of cognitive abilities in neurological patients. National Adult Reading Test (NART). Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) scores for the two TBI groups were compared using independent samples t-tests. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. The appropriateness of a given approach is likely to depend on the patient under investigation, but those based on reading ability/word knowledge are among the most widely employed, particularly in North America, UK and Australia (e.g., Crawford, Stewart, Cochrane, Parker, & Besson, Citation1989; Mathias, Bowden, & Barrett-Woodbridge, Citation2007; Skilbeck, Dean, Thomas, & Slatyer, Citation2013). 3, 53 The M-ACE consists of 5 items with a maximum score of 30. Typically, school leaving age of 16 corresponds to level I, 18 to level II; levels III and IV included participants currently undertaking that level of study. Shura RD, Ord AS, Martindale SL, Miskey HM, Taber KH. 3099067 Please note that the item can still be purchased. These potential problems can be avoided by eschewing estimates based on current test performance, i.e., by using demographic data only, but demographic-based approaches raise other concerns. To the authors knowledge, no study has assessed whether the WTAR can provide a stable estimate of premorbid intellectual ability in the first 12 months following mild TBI (mTBI) or moderate/severe TBI (msevTBI) in comparison with healthy controls. You can find STAAR raw score conversion tables listed below. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. WebThe univariate analyses are pre- netic risk for psychosis and deterioration of 30% or more on the sented in an online supplement, and significant findings are Global Assessment of Functioning scale in the past 12 months, integrated within the Results section. Kirton JW, Soble JR, Marceaux JC, Messerly J, Bain KM, Webber TA, Fullen C, Alverson WA, McCoy KJM. For example, the shared variance (r2) between Vocabulary and Block Design scaled scores was less than 10%, rising to 12% for the combined hold measure. In contrast, those participants with mTBI did not significantly differ from healthy controls and both the mTBI and control groups demonstrated stability on the WTAR over time. Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab. Joseph AC, Lippa SM, McNally SM, Garcia KM, Leary JB, Dsurney J, Chan L. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read. Orme and colleagues (2004) compared WRAT Reading subtest performance in individuals with mild, moderate, and severe TBI during the acute rehabilitation hospitalization and again 1 year later. M-ACE. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Riley and Simmonds (2003) administered the NART to individuals with severe head injury while they were within the first year of recovery and again after a year. Mixed ANOVAs were used to determine whether healthy controls, patients with mTBI, and patients with msevTBI performed differently on the WTAR, TMT, and CVLT-II Trials 15 Total between baseline and 1 year following injury. 2014 Sep;27(3):148-54. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000035. Epub 2019 Sep 17. Procedures were approved by the University ethics panel and followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. WebTest of Premorbid Functioning Estimates amount of cognitive functioning lost due to brain injury. WebWechsler Test of Adult Reading. Our findings suggest that tests of word reading/vocabulary knowledge provide the most reliable and precise estimates of WAIS-IV performance, and previous work indicates that their utility for predicting premorbid IQ holds in a range of neurological conditions (Bright et al., Citation2002). Participants self-declared that they had no history of neurological or psychiatric disorder. Knowledge of intelligence is essential for interpreting cognitive performance following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Categories based on occupational status and education, for example, are arguably too coarse to provide an accurate premorbid IQ for a specific individual. The independent ability of the ToPF/demographic score and the Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) to predict WAIS-IV Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) was examined, as were discrepancies between ToPF and WAIS-IV scores within and between participants. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. The British NART, WTAR and WAIS-IV were then administered (in that order) according to standardised instructions. Older adults with no cognitive complaints obtained a mean score of 23 ( SD = 2.4) ( Rabin et al., 2007 ); thus, these values can be used to convert the raw score to a z-score. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). Researchers and clinicians working with UK populations who employ NART or WTAR may therefore wish to consider applying our equations in order to compare actual and predicted premorbid WAIS-IV (rather than WAIS-R/WAIS-III) performance. The WTAR was co-normed with the Wechsler WebName: Test of Premorbid Functioning - Raw score. 8600 Rockville Pike Healthy adult controls (n=52) were recruited through local advertisements and selected to match participants with TBI on demographic variables of age, sex, ethnicity, and education. The regression equations were as follows: NART predicted WAIS-IV FSIQ=.9775 NART error+126.41, WTAR predicted WAIS-IV FSIQ=1.2206 WTAR error+119.63. A revised and updated version of the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading, UK Version (TOPF UK). We are unable to identify your country location. The basic score on any test is the raw score, which is simply the Anecdotally, and in clinical practice, two tests are commonly selected to provide a comparator against hold performance (Block Design and Digit Span). To allow for comparison with WTAR-predicted IQ, T-scores for CVLT-II Trials 15 Total and TMT were converted to standard scores and are displayed in Table 2 for each group over the 12-month period. The WTAR provides an accurate estimate of premorbid intellectual functioning in a variety of cognitively impaired populations (Wechsler, 2001). B., et al. Results: Multiple correlations between demographic variables and individual government site. UK: Pearson Corporation] for ACS/TOPF. They concluded that the WRAT Reading subtest underestimates premorbid functioning in those with more severe head injuries during the acute recovery period. An official website of the United States government. Neuropsychological Assessment Battery, Judgment Subtest.
Karen Pritzker Daughter, Myapps Lacounty Gov Dmh, Digitalocean Load Balancer Health Check Kubernetes, Mamie Louise Hansberry, Good Reasons For Interdistrict Transfer In California, Articles T